SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Fred Carstensen)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:58 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Wilson, somewhere, has exactly this story -- that the original expression was "laissez
nous faire" -- but the point was NOT to eliminate government, it was a request to Colbert
to stop activist intervention. That is, set the rules and enforce them, don't constantly
intervene. Any businessman understands the importance of property and contract law, and
that markets are social institutions, so, as I recall, Wilson was emphasizing that the
term did not carry the meaning so often given to it today--the notion of an unregulated
economy (e.g. Iraq under American "control" as a recent cartoon suggested) -- but rather a
more subtle and sophisticated understanding of the interaction between civil authority and
markets.
 
Fred Carstensen 
Economics 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2