SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Bill Williams)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Thomas (Tim) Leonard in a catalog of how the term "utility" has been used says, among
other things, that,
 
> 20th-century rational-choice theory uses "utility" as a name for a mathematical function
that represents a single, complete, transitive ordering of preferences over consumption
bundles.
 
> 3) utility is not measurable, which makes policy (if not voluntary trade) problematic,
but
> 4) different kinds of utility are presumed commensurable, at least in the standard
theory that assumes a single (and complete) ordering of preferences.
 
The, or at least a, prominent question for 20th century theory has been whether this
conception of "utility" will necessarily generate downward sloping demand functions.
 
Bill Williams 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2