SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:03 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Scott Cullen)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
John Womack asks: "Isn't this a circular definition of "utility"? That "utility" is
anything for which a price is paid?"
 
I'm not sure I said that.  I said "...isn't it self-evident that having paid a price to
acquire it [an ostentation or collectible good] there is utility?"  I intended to ask if
paying a price for a good isn't evidence that it has the characteristic of utility for the
purchaser.  Other examples of utility might be simply use (picking up a stick from the
ground to aid in walking, no exchange, no price paid) or enjoyment (a smile when hitting a
gold ball with that new titanium club).
 
Scott Cullen 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2