SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Eric Schliesser)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:15 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I have the utmost respect and admiration for the writings of A.S. Skinner; I always cite
his works approvingly in my own writings.  But I don't quite understand why his authority
should override an argument based on a direct interpretation of the text of WN. I am all
in favor of being sensitive to intellectual context, but it can't replace careful reading
and reflection of the text under scrutiny. I would very much welcome a different
interpretation of the passage from WN. I.ii.2 that I quoted, but I am not very impressed
by arguments from authority.
 
Cheers! 
Eric 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2