SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Scott Cullen)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:43 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
John Womack asks: "Isn't this a circular definition of "utility"? That 
"utility" is anything for which a price is paid?" 
 
I'm not sure I said that.  I said "...isn't it self-evident that having 
paid a price to acquire it [an ostentation or collectible good] there is 
utility?"  I intended to ask if paying a price for a good isn't evidence 
that it has the characteristic of utility for the purchaser.  Other 
examples of utility might be simply use (picking up a stick from the ground 
to aid in walking, no exchange, no price paid) or enjoyment (a smile when 
hitting a gold ball with that new titanium club). 
 
Scott Cullen 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2