SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Mohammad Gani)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
E. Roy Weintraub's concern with the fitness of a message for this list is well taken. I
will be very careful before sending another message.
 
I have a simple question. Is it proper for this list to carry messages that clarify points
by showing an example of how it could be phrased differently than has been done
historically? Is original criticism of past views eligible?
 
With the best regards, 
 
Mohammad Gani 
      
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2