Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:35:17 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Sharon: that's a fascinating topic. I looked for the study and I'm
assuming you mean this one:
The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You
Want to See in The Colbert Reportby LaMarre et al. Yes?
You also allude to other "Recent studies" -- can you mention a few of the
ones you find most intriguing?
thanks, --Hal B.
*************************
> Modern Language Association Annual Convention 2012
> Seattle, 5-9 January 2012
>
> Satire's Double-Edged Irony
>
> The American Humor Studies Association is seeking papers that explore the
> often
> ambiguous nature of satire's object, the lines that blur between satire and
> celebration, and the difficulty of predicting or controlling audience
> response.
>
> Recent studies, such as "The Irony of Satire," suggest that the perception
> of
> satire's object often rests in the reader's or viewer's own biases. This
> panel
> is interested in exploring the implications of this ambiguity in the
> production,
> deployment, and teaching of satire. How does this affect satire's
> admittedly
> subversive purpose? Is this satire's power, its limitation, or both?
>
> 250-word abstracts by 15 March 2011.
> Sharon McCoy
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
>
--
Harold K. Bush, Ph.D
Professor of English
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO 63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>
|
|
|