SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Nicholas J. Theocarakis)
Date:
Fri Jan 19 13:55:14 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
Dupuit suggested the _concept_ of consumer surplus, but he certainly never 
used the words "deadweight loss" which was Nicola Giocoli's question. 
Ekelund's & Hebert's definitive book on Dupuit  does not even have an index 
entry on deadweight loss.

Nicholas J. Theocarakis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2