SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:19 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Steven, 
 
Thank you for confirming that my memory regarding the respective  
roles of the Mills in all this was not completely incorrect.  I dug into  
this several years ago out of curiosity.   
 
Now, I do not have a copy of Say's book in my office, and am not  
going to the library now to check it out.  But, when I was interested in  
this I did go look at it, probably the first edition. I remember  
somewhere in the book that he allowed for the possibility of what we  
would call "hoarding" of money.  And, at that point, he allowed as how  
what you are calling the "law of markets" might not work.  Certainly  
through much of the book he was a more or less advocate of "Say's  
Law."  But, my remarks about his views were not that he was an  
ineffective advocate or one who had poorly thought out his arguments.   
Rather it was that he in fact, at least in one edition, admitted somewhere  
that the "law" might not always hold if persons hoarded money.   
 
Barkley Rosser 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2