SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Sumitra Shah)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:49 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Nicholas J. Theocarakis wrote:  
...I am not accusing anyone that  s/he ignores constraints. I object  
to the fact that constraints are taken for granted.   
   
Economics as a science takes most of the social phenomena as outside its positivist
purview and therefore exogenous.  Perhaps the trouble really lies in the 'economics' &
'political economy' dichotomy. In the development of economics as a highly precise,
mathematical (physics-like?)  discipline, it did create a Moloch (had to look this one up)
on whose altar the social nature of the subject had to be sacrificed. There is a
schizophrenic quality to this development, a far cry from the classical view of what they
were trying to do. The normative concerns of economic society  necessarily get a short
shrift in the process.
   
Sumitra Shah  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2