Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:03:11 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
thanks Sean; that's a great point. early conspiracy theory at its most
laughable! -hb
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Sean Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dar Hal:
>
> Condolences. I was very curious about this odd idea that Oxford wrote
> Shakespeare and did some reading into this area at one point. The thing
> that really made me laugh - literally - was reading some of the poetry
> attributed to the Earl of Oxford (you can find this on the pro-Oxford sites
> so they don't deny the earl wrote it). Part way through the third poem I
> could not stop laughing. People think this amateur wrote the works of
> Shakespeare? Of course the Oxford supporters will claim the earl wrote
> that
> mediocre poetry so no one would guess he was the genius behind the poetry
> of
> Shakespeare - because no self-respecting aristocrat would like to be known
> as a literary genius. They'd much rather be known as a barely competent
> dabbler.
>
> Best,
>
> Sean Russell
>
--
Prof. Harold K. Bush
Professor of English
3800 Lindell
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO 63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>
|
|
|