SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (James Wible)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:16 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
The first time I heard the term "thin" to describe anything was in Rawls's "Theory of
Justice."  Rawls uses the term to apply to a thin theory of the good which was all he
needed for the first two thirds of his book.  There is no negative connotation for his
usage that I can detect.  In part III, he needs a "full" or "comprehensive" theory of the
good for the purposes of that part of his work.  See pages 397ff.  With regard to the
history of economics, it is Rawls usage which I had in mind when I read recent comments
about thin and thick histories.  Both may be useful and serve different purposes.
 
Jim Wible 
University of New Hampshire 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2