----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Tom Walker said: 
 
<< "This little known pamphlet . . . represents an essential advance over Ricardo. It
directly designates surplus-value . . .  as surplus labour. . . . This has already been
stated by Adam Smith and forms a main factor in Ricardo's analysis. But they did not say
so nor fix it anywhere in absolute form." >>
 
Maybe they didn't say it explicitly because they had no intention of saying it.  
 
Chas Anderson 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]