SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Kevin D. Hoover)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:47 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Whatever benefits a knowledge of the history of a discipline may confer on   
current researchers, the precautionary benefits are surely   
enormous.  Barbara Tuchman wrote a book, The March of Folly:  From Troy to   
Vietnam.  One need not even read the book to understand the sentiment that   
seeing how errors were made might be instructive.  Yes, the physicians who   
pooh-pooh the "history of error" are not stupid, as Professor Womack   
observes, but then neither were the physicians who committed the errors of   
the past.  Pride precedeth the fall.  The arrogance of physicians (and the   
rest of us) can only be promoted by contempt for our predecessors and   
ignorance of their history.  The upside for future historians is that   
they'll have plenty of error to write about the present day.  
  
Kevin Hoover  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2