Anil Kumar Nauriya said  
>  
>He says for example: "When one appreciates that the 'poor worker' would be worse off in
the absence of such an opportunity to work, it gets one to think differently about the
employer".
>  
>This is the precise argument that is sometimes used to justify child labour.  
  
  
So, what's wrong with "child labor"?  And, what's the age cutoff, below which it can't be
defended?
  
Sam Bostaph