SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Robert Whaples' review is properly headed "Economic History in a *'Mainstream'* Reference
Work." I bought the first edition several years ago, with the intent to add it to my
course outline. I read (most of) it and dropped that idea. It represents the sort of
'mainstream' that equates economics with the neoclassical-cum-econometric paradigm:
measurement without theory, theory without people, people without history. Most modern
introductory textbooks take the same approach to the teaching of our discipline, so why
prescribe a short-order cookbook for our students?
 
Jesse Vorst 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2