Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue Jul 24 10:09:38 2007 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear colleagues,
in 1883, Sidgwick wrote:
? So, again, if it is economically advantageous
to a nation to keep up forests, on account of
their beneficial effects in moderating and
equalising rainfall, the advantage is one which
private enterprise has no tendency to provide ;
since no one could appropriate and sell
improvements to climate ? Henry Sidgwick, The
Principles of Political Economy
p. 406, 3d. ed 1901, 1st Ed 1883
I was wondering what the main reason would be why
Sidgwick did not see that improvements to climate
could actually be sold (through a tradable quotas
scheme). Any suggestions?
Many thanks in advance,
Yours sincerely,
Axel Gosseries
|
|
|