Roy Weintraub wrote:
> Think Friedman on assumptions, Samuelson on
> operationalism, Becker on family sociology, Hayek on psychology, Keynes on
> probability, etc. How much of our study of Friedman say should focus on
> his contribution's importance among economists in contrast to his lack of
> sophistication viewed from the perspective of philosophers of science?
'Keynes on probability'? At least one philosopher (Russell) regarded K as an
expert in that field on the strength of his fellowship dissertation (later
published.)
A. M. C. Waterman