SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Wed Mar 7 08:11:57 2007
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Barkley Rosser)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
    In reply to Steve Kates, and in this case not
really disagreeing with him, I will note that for 
all of his advocacy of Keynesian ideas, for many of
the edtions of his influential Principles text, Paul
Samuelson had a section on business cycle theories
in which he reproduced the full list (or nearly) of
those presented by Haberler in his book, with a 
pretty similar explanation.  Of course Samuelson
was a student of Haberler as well as having been
influenced by Keynes.  It would appear that he did
not see Keynes as replacing Haberler's set of listed
theories so much as augmenting it.

Barkley Rosser


ATOM RSS1 RSS2