Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:06:34 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wesley,
Thank you for addressing the bibliography debate. I personally interpreted
the e-mail to be typical of correspondence between university professors. I
worked for seven years at a major university as a lecturer, and was copied
on e-mail discussions with a similar tone and approach. However, I think it
is a good idea to minimize the extent of it due to the diverse audience of
the Forum.
Best regards and with appreciation,
Gail Levitt
-----Original Message-----
From: Wesley Britton <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: newer Forum members
>Judging from postings to me privately and on this Forum, I see a need to
>address a more important matter than a long out-dated controversy.
>
>Several folks stated they now feel reluctant to post questions or make
>comments in the light of the heavy-duty "war horses" responses to queries.
>I deeply hope this doesn't happen. This issue has arisen before with some
>old
>types complaining about high school students asking for term paper help to
>those who want no discussions at all and simply want to read scholarly
>information. From time to time, lively discussions do erupt over any
number
>of matters, and no one should feel they are not welcome to pose questions
or
>contribute to the debate. Sure, some questions may have been asked before,
>and repeatedly, and sometimes referring such questions to our Forum
archives
>is a good response. But I hope no non-academic or newbie to the profession
>will ever pull back from honest questions or responses to them. Asking what
>definitive books are out there was a perfectly valid question and resulted
>in the most engaging discussion we've had in ages. Thanks for asking.
>
>And I thank those who observed that the central point John and I were
trying
>to make is that we were telling a general reader why we're cautious in the
>books to recommend. Controversy will occur time and time again and there's
>nothing wrong with that. We are, after all, the champions of HUCKLEBERRY
>FINN.
|
|
|