SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:07 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
A nice way to integrate the Keynesian cross analysis with the AD/AS analysis is to do the
former in nominal terms. This allows a straight carryover to the AD/AS space with the
shape of the AS curve giving the breakout of the P/Q
change for any nominal income change arising from a shift of AD, the latter determined by
the Keynesian cross analysis.
 
It is my understanding that there were a few textbooks that did this, Dolan for one, some
time ago. But it seems to have become unacceptable.
 
Barkley Rosser 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2