SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Spencer Banzhaf)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:50 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
  
On the narrow issue of accounting for leaky buckets.  In fact, at least under US GAAP
accounting (the official audited accounts submitted to the Securities & Exchange
Commission), such returns are a liability.  (Actually, they are netted out of assets on
the balance sheet and out of revenues on the statements of earnings and cash flows.)  If
you look carefully at the footnotes for a firm's 10-k filing, you will say a boilerplate
paragraph on how it has estimated the appropriate provision for future returns & refunds.
So if Acme Bucket Corp estimates, based on past experience for example, that 1% of it's
buckets are leaky, it has to write down 1% of it's inventory and 1% of its bucket revenue.
  
Spencer Banzhaf 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2