SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Forstater, Mathew)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:52 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Sam writes: On the assumption that our reason is the source of the  
programming of our emotional responses, this "critique" would seem to  
identify irrationality as feminine, although I doubt the authors are  
aware of this.  
  
Again, confusing the identification of the association with the  
endorsement of it.   
  
For Sam and Tony, and others who relate to their comments, see:  
  
Feminism and Economics  
Julie A. Nelson  
The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 2. (Spring, 1995), pp.  
131-148.  
Stable URL:  
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0895-3309%28199521%299%3A2%3C131%3AFAE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H   
  
"What *is* important to the point here, and what has been shown in a  
number of studies, is the way in which people in U.S. and European  
cultures tend to mentally *associate* certain characteristics with  
masculinity or femininity. (Nelson, 1995, p. 133n2)  
  
Mathew Forstater  
  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2