SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Coffin, Donald)
Date:
Mon Jul 17 09:47:45 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
When thinking about the minimum wage as a "fallacy" (and I agree with  
others that how the term "fallacy" is being used here is somewhat  
vague), it's worth recalling that one of the arguments made in Congress  
in the 1930s in favor of enacting a minimum wage was precisely that it  
would reduce teenage employment and induce employers to substitute  
(some) adult labor.  So where's the fallacy in that?  
  
Donald A. Coffin  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2