To me, at a theoretical level, there is no essential connection (and
indeed a tension or possible conflict) between 'capitalism' and
democracy in Friedman and other strong 'laissez-faire' economist:
the Friedmanites favor 'free markets,' private property rights, etc.,
and they favor those things regardless of the democratic wishes of
the people.
Conversely, democrats (admittedly, there is also a wide range here)
favor the right to vote, the right to free speech & assembly, and
then the rule of the people -- by a majority. So democrats would be
willing to modify Friedmanite markets and property rights (e.g.,
they'd be willing to tax or to regulate) in order to produce social
results, such as health care, education, etc., and to protect
individuals (and, apparently, capitalism) by e.g. regulating the
terms under which mortgages can be granted . . . .
Peter G. Stillman
|