SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES QUERY -- origin of "externality"
From:
[log in to unmask] (Daniel W. Bromley)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:30 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
Barkley,  yes Knight was indeed much earlier than Ellis and Fellner  
and his was a comment on 2 papers by F.D. Graham in Feb and Nov  
1923.    
  
I do not think Kinght's treatment was necessarily "narrower" in  
that it addressed perceptions of private and social costs.  But he  
did not use "externality" or "externalities" 
 
Bator was the one, unless the Samuelson faction can produce a  
citation for us. 
 
dan 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2