[I think it's time to start a new thread since this isn't about anniversaries any more.
(And I am sorry for the typo I didn't catch in all of those subject lines.)
  
This conversation came from  
  
http://eh.net/pipermail/hes/2006-January/003466.html  
  
HB]  
  
  
  
E. Roy Weintraub said:  
>A critique of a body [sic -- whose?] of economic analysis may be called   
>"feminist" if that critique is developed from an analysis of the gendered  
>assumptions that underlie the distinctions and presuppostions of those texts.  
  
  
What's a "gendered assumption"?  Words have genders in some languages, but I  
take it that you are not referring to that aspect of language.  
  
Samuel Bostaph