SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Peart, Sandra)
Date:
Thu Jun 21 21:09:51 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Dear Colleagues,

It gives me great pleasure to announce the History of Economics 
Society awards for 2007.

Best Article Award:  This year, the HES best article committee, 
comprised of Alain Marciano (chair), Sheryl Kasper, Stephen Meardon, 
Leonidas Montes, and Pedro Teixeira, has chosen the paper by Mauro 
Boianovsky, "The Making of Chapters 13 and 14 of Patinkin's Money, 
Interest, and Prices", published in HOPE, as the best paper for 
2006.  The committee praised the significance of the subject matter 
as well as the care with which Mauro conducted his research.  It is 
noteworthy that this is the second time Mauro has won the best 
article award.  He earned the award previously for his article, 
"Wicksell on Deflation in the Early 1920s," HOPE 1999.

The Joseph Dorfman Best Dissertation award:  The committee, Fatima 
Brandao, Evellyn Forget and Carl Wennerlind, has unanimously agreed 
to award the Dorman award for the best dissertation to Tiago Mata 
for his dissertation, Dissent in Economics:  Making Radical 
Political Economics and Post Keynesian Economics, 1960-1080, 
completed in 2006 at the London School of Economics under the 
supervision of Mary Morgan.  The committee wrote:  We commend Mata 
for contributing to the field of history of economic thought with 
careful analyses of the emergence and trajectory of two important, 
yet understudied, subfields in economics... .  In his work we learn 
how these subfields cohered around intellectual and political 
dissent against the prevailing economic orthodoxy and how their 
criticisms and polemics earned them increasing respect and popularity."

The Joseph J. Spengler Best Book award:  The committee of Cristina 
Marcuzzo (chair), Maria Pagenelli, and Joseph Persky chose Jealousy 
of Trade, by Istvan Hont, as this year's Spengler book 
recipient.  They wrote:  "We found Hont's book to be monumental in 
the detail and breadth of its scholarship.  His understanding of 
both the primary texts he utilizes and the broader 
political-economic-historical contexts of that work is indeed 
masterful.  ... This is both an outstanding work in the history of 
economic and political ideas and a work that is relevant to ongoing 
discussions today about globalization and the nation-state."

Distinguished Fellow Awards:  This year, the committee (Wade Hands, 
chair, Mary Morgan, and Roy Weintraub), chose two scholars whose 
scholarly achievements reflect common themes for the Distinguished 
Fellow award:  Anthony Waterman and Donald Winch.

Anthony Waterman studied as an undergraduate at Selwyn College under 
his tutor, Joan Robinson.  He emigrated to Canada, and studied 
theology at St. John's COllege in Winnipeg, being ordained in 
1963.  His doctoral work was conducted at ANU.  In 1991, he 
published "Revolutions, Eocnmics and Relition," makring the 
culmiantion of a decade of study.  In this work, he makes the case 
that scarcity was the central point of contention between the 
romantic political economists and the utilitarian political 
economists of the 19th century.  In 2005, he published "Political 
Economy and Christian Theology since the Enlightenment,"  where he 
examines the history of the estrangement of theology and political economy.

Donald Winch, Emeritus Professor of Intellecutal History, School of 
Humanities, Suffolk University, obtained his economics degree at the 
LSE and then studied under Viner at Princeton.  He has published 
books on economic thought during the 'classical' period that 
emphasize the connections between theory, policy and public 
debate.  In 1987, he published his book on Malthus, and, in 1996, 
"Riches and Poverty:  An Intellectual History of Political Economy 
in Britain, 1750-1834."  In his review of this book, Waterman writes 
that it is "magisterial."  This is precisely correct.  Like 
Waterman, Winch places Malthus (as opposed to Ricardo) at the center 
of the debate between the romantics (Carlyle, Ruskin and the like) 
and the utilitarian economists and churchmen.

Please join me in congratulating our colleagues for these well 
deserved awards.

Sandra Peart


ATOM RSS1 RSS2