SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Deirdre McCloskey)
Date:
Wed Jun 27 13:14:32 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Dear Roger,

Well, sure, no one could read four from everyone.  But they could read 
overlapping samples of four from, say, 10% of the whole, which would 
then bring some intellectual content into their deliberations.  It's 
not---as the bureaucrats always claim---this or that technical problem 
that prevents us from having intellectually serious evaluations. 

Warm regards,

Deirdre McCloskey 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2