SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Deirdre McCloskey)
Date:
Mon Jun 30 10:32:18 2008
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Dear John,

What you say about the conventionality of property rights is correct, first
articulated by Rousseau.

What I had in mind was to go a step further.  If OUP is actually asserting a
right over that foundational text in substantial quotations---as I say, I'm
still a little fuzzy on what exactly OUP is asserting, since I got into the
discussion late---then we as scholars who supply OUP with manuscripts and
demand their books should mount a boycott.  If the OUP action is as
bloodyminded as I imagine, then bloddymindedness in reply is in order, I
suppose.  But maybe it's not so bad as I imagine.  In any case we have the
option of simply refusing to pay.

Regards,

Deirdre McCloskey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2