SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robin Neill)
Date:
Tue Jun 20 10:21:00 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Colleagues:  
  
        It is interesting to see that the academy still debating   
whether the town leads the country or the country the town in the   
process of economic advance.  We are still considering the   
difference between Russian and Chinese comunist doctrine, and   
whether A. Smith was right about the town and the country.    
Further, one would expect, and it has often been asserted with   
evidence, that where an unequal distribution of wealth is associated   
with relatively large investment in development, egalitarianism is   
inconsistent with economic growth.  But this too is an "old   
chestnut".  
  
        Plus ca change, plus c'est le meme chose.  
  
Robin Neill  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2