SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Warren Samuels)
Date:
Wed May 17 15:01:01 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
 The "refutation" outlined by Pat Gunning is not quite as conclusive as he   
 would have it.  
   
 His argument turns on the desire for precise measurement and for equity   
 across all classes of unearned increments.  
   
 The imposition of a meaningful differential betwewen improved and unimproved   
 land will accomplish much, without pretending full isolation.  
   
 And there is a difference between classes of rent.  Perhaps all classes   
 other than land rent also require the action of the recipient to put their   
 endowments to work, whereas land value increases independent of that due to   
 population growth.  
  
 Warren J. Samuels  
  
  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2