SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Colander, David)
Date:
Thu Feb 28 08:12:41 2008
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)

I've been traveling which is why it has taken me a while to weigh in on this. But here is my take. 

Formalism has waned. Economics today is quite different than the economics I picked on 20 years ago.

My latest survey of the profession captured that clearly and I talked a lot with David Leonhart about the changes in the profession, and his sense is similar to mine. The science of economics and its engineering counterpart is becoming much more useful.  But what he missed in that article was that there is another branch of economics--political economy--which has been lost to economics, and there I agree with Humberto. 

David Colander



ATOM RSS1 RSS2