Samuel Bostaph wrote:   
> "Intended order" is important at the micro level in   
> economic organization.  At the economy level, all it has   
> produced historically is misery for the general   
> population--and for the reasons that Mises and Hayek   
> outlined in the 1920s and 30s.   
  
At this point I would contend the conversation has drifted   
from history of thought to ideological assertion.  Perhaps   
a discussion of Hobbes is in order?  
  
Cheers,  
Alan Isaac