SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robin Foliet Neill)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:19 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
The "1776" in the original question should have been "1876".  That  
is quite right.   
 
The question was asked in a moment of idle rumination, and  
without sufficient attention.  As I have become aware of the early  
use of the term, however, I have also become aware that the  
meaning that has been attached to the term has changed.  Would  
it have been Derrida who would have written the history of  
economics by uncovering the effective contextualization of the term  
in different periods?   
 
Robin Neill 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2