SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Albert Himoe)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:22 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
[This is a list for History of Economics, broadly defined. We can stray a bit, but, as
moderator, I ask everyone to stay within the scope of the History of Economics. HB]
  
  
Sumitra Shah wrote:  
  
Albert Himoe wrote:  
> "East Asians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans have on the   
> average higher IQs than whites." By the way, the three   
> ethnicities  listed above are all East Asians. I suppose that   
> was for emphasis.   
  
You are right, the three nationalities were meant to define "East  
Asians", or the Orientals of my youth. Perhaps I should have stuck to  
the term Mongoloids, as one of the big 3 racial groupings; Caucasoids,  
Negroids, and Mongoloids.  
  
> And I wonder how women fare in Rushton's  research. I am sure   
> I don't want to know.  
  
He has determined [with Ankney] that women have smaller brains in  
relation to body size than men.   
  
Albert Himoe   
  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2