Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri May 18 08:15:21 2007 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mason Gaffney wrote:
> I apologize to Yuri if this looks like a criticism aimed at him - that is
> not my intent at all. I just like to raise consciousness of semantic
issues.
This is precisely how I understood Professor Gaffney's comment.
> [...] I wonder if "vandalism" is the best word?
Again, this is not my characterization. I alluded to books which have
"revolutionary vandalism" in the title. See http://tinyurl.com/2fz9uz.
> I grant that burning old chains of title
> is a sort of vandalism per se, but I don't think that is the major point.
Probably it was a very big point to people like Edmund Burke or Alexander
Pushkin. I happen to have, at hand, a quotation from the latter:
"An enlightened Frenchman or Englishman values any single line written by an
ancient chronicler, with the mentioning of the name of his ancestor, an
honourable knight who fell in a certain battle or returned in a certain year
from Palestine, but the Kalmyks [Pushkin uses a handy ethnonym to denote
those who lack Burkean "prejudices"] have neither nobility nor history.
Savagery, baseness and ignorance have no reverence for the past, but only
grovelling before the present." (Translation is mine.)
Yuri Tulupenko
|
|
|