Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:47 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
An illustration of the significance of forgetting is a paper by myself and David
Laidler "What was lost with IS-LM" in the recent HOPE Supplement (vol 36,
2004) "The IS-LM Model: Its Rise, Fall, and Strange Persistence", edited by
Michel De Vroey and Kevin D. Hoover. We argue there that the history of
macroeconomics might have been very different had economists not forgotten
about much that economists writing before 1936 understood well, rediscovering
these ideas in an intellectual context that had changed dramatically.
Of course, one has to be extremely careful with such counter-factual claims,
which raise many difficult historiographic issues, but this example suggests
the value of remembering the past, and hints at why it may sometimes be very
difficult not to forget things.
Roger Backhouse
|
|
|