SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Coleman, William)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:49 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
  
About the Federal Reserve's notes being a liability or not of the Fed:  
I think James Ahiakpor has exagerated the significance of his  
observation that a defective US note may be returned to the Fed,  and a  
good one obtained in its place  
If I buy a bucket and discover it has a hole, then by both common law  
and consumer law I have the right to a refund or exchange from the  
retailer.  
  
Does that make the the value of sold buckets a liability of the  
retailer?  
  
I would not have thought so.  
  
I guess there is a contingent liability there: equal to the value of  
buckets sold that are defective, but that would be an almost negligible  
percentage of the total value sold.  
  
  
William Coleman  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2