SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (James C.W. Ahiakpor)
Date:
Mon Dec 4 14:09:36 2006
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
References:
<007301c71368$6831d010$6401a8c0@asteriskd044ef> <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
John Medaille asked: "Do I take it then that we have reached agreement   
at least on the third point, that Ricardo assumed that capital is   
confined to national boundaries?"  
  
No, Ricardo did not assume that capitals are always confined to national   
boundaries.  On the possibility of capital mobility between countries   
and its determinants in Ricardo's analyses, see e.g., Works 1: 136-7,   
247-8, 2:452, and 3: 274.  
  
James Ahiakpor  
  
  
  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2