SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Fred Foldvary)
Date:
Mon Jan 29 13:29:49 2007
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> laissez-faire advocates ... were ... generally in
dominant positions
> Roger Backhouse


These economists were "laissez faire" in thinking that
greatly expanded government intervention was not
warranted, but they were not radically pro
free-market.

A pure laissez faire position would have opposed
central banking and the federal income tax, both
initiated in 1913.

Were any economists prior to the 1930s for a pure free
market?

Fred Foldvary


ATOM RSS1 RSS2