SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES: RE: QUERY--Economics vs. Political Economy
From:
[log in to unmask] (J Kevin Quinn)
Date:
Tue Jun 17 08:10:49 2008
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
References:
<[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines) 
Alan- I think I was making identifying "self-evident" with "analytic," and your mathematical example persuades me that I was wrong. Kant would certainly call "4+3 =7" a synthetic statement and it does indeed appear self-evident. Sorry.

J Kevin Quinn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2