SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Andrew Farrant)
Date:
Mon Dec 11 19:07:00 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>  
>No. The idea of any step towards intervention  
>producing instantanous tyrany is not in the RTS.   
  
  
  
But what about the cumulative logic of intervention argument? Is that there?  
  
  
  
Hayek  
>argued that comprehensive planning and democracy were  
>incompatible, but it could take a few generations for  
>democratic freedoms to be eliminated entirely. THat's  
>his main claim.  
  
Does democracy break to save the plan or does the plan break to save  
 democracy in Hayek's view?  
  
  
>  
>In the talk, not the comments.  
  
Was talk on Hayek?  
  
  
Andrew Farrant  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2