SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Hofrichter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:37:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (413 lines)
The disagreement is not about whether you can do both at once.
"Compressing the SES gradient" is precisely a long-term political
struggle, which will not be resolved by programs and services. You can't
nickel and dime your way to equity without an effort to transform
institutions and political power. No one says it has to happen
overnight. The civil rights movement didn't; the women's movement
didn't. What's the narrative that links all of the SDOH? Is the idea to
single each one out one at a time, like we do with diseases? 



Richard Hofrichter, PhD
Senior Analyst, Health Equity
National Association of County & City Health Officials
1100 17th St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: 202-507-4229
Fax: 202-783-1583
email: [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Davidson, Alan
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Myths about health inequities...

Agreed.
Alan Davidson
UBC-O

________________________________

From: Social Determinants of Health on behalf of Goldberg, Daniel
Sent: Fri 13/06/2008 10:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SDOH] Myths about health inequities...


I disagree that improving SES doesn't do anything about social processes
and imbalances of political power that create inequities.  It's an
indirect means of doing so, but those imbalances of power are in
significant part a function of socioeconomic disparities.  To be sure,
power imbalances are not reducible to these disparities, but what kind
of social change are we looking for if it isn't intended to compress the
SES gradient and reduce SES disparities? 
 
In any case, I admit to a failure of imagination in seeing how any of
this means we ought not invest substantial efforts in improving access
to and investment in education.  Why can't we parallel process? Work to
link efforts as to SDOH to larger movements for social change, while
acknowledging that different policy goals have different feasibility
profiles, and that agitating for radical redistribution of income, may
not be likely to happen in the short-term, no matter how laudable and
desirable a goal it is (and it is one I unreservedly support).
Accordingly, I tend to think that exclusively focusing on radical social
change as a means of improving population health ignores a myriad of
other policy goals with better feasibility profiles in the short-term
that we have reason to believe will improve health and reduce human
suffering.
 
I've written about this as the ethics of health policy paradox.  While
we cannot let what we can accomplish define what we ought to do (b/c
this would be a rank instance of the naturalistic fallacy), if we let
what we ought to do exhaust the set of what we try to do, we are
unlikely to actually achieve policy change.  There is a profound
difference between policy and advocacy, as important as the latter is to
the former.  I don't see it as an either/or proposition.  We can both
work for more radical social change and, while doing so, support social
policies (like increased investment in education) that are
evidence-based in terms of population health.   
 
________________________________

From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Richard Hofrichter
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SDOH] Myths about health inequities...



SES is a static, descriptive category. Improving SES (education,
employment, income) as a way to eliminate health inequity doesn't do
anything about the social processes and imbalances of political power
that created inequities in the first place. Embedded in this way of
thinking not only avoids acting on root causes, it ignores even
recognizing those causes: that populations experiencing health inequity
had bad luck, random events intervened, etc. Endless efforts at
remediation will fail because the interests at work generating inequity
will continue to do so. Emphasizing behavioral change and fixing
individuals to function better in society is a distraction. Efforts to
cheapen labor around the world, dump waste in communities of color,
gentrify communities through redlining by banks, moving jobs overseas,
etc. is not about behavior. The question is: why is there inequality?
Because the task is daunting doesn't mean that there is no place to
begin in producing social change. This defeatist attitude that we are
stuck in a perpetual present of existing power arrangements ignores
contingency and agency as well as history. The great advances in public
health in the US in the early part of the twentieth century were not the
result of programs, or educating people about changing their behavior.
It was about major social change based on struggle: abolishing child
labor, the eight hour workday, the sanitation movement, and the
introduction of housing and factory codes. Even small steps in
transforming institutions is a valuable advance. Without discussing ways
to link health equity to larger social movements for change and to name
the interests involved and how influence works, there will be very
little progress.

 

 

Richard Hofrichter, PhD

Senior Analyst, Health Equity

National Association of County & City Health Officials

1100 17th St. NW

Washington, DC 20036

Tel: 202-507-4229

Fax: 202-783-1583

email: [log in to unmask]

________________________________

From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Goldberg, Daniel
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 12:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Myths about health inequities...

 

Really?

 

I think there's really good reason to believe that higher levels of
education are correlated with better SES.

 

But what's more, when we're talking about the SDOH, we're not just
talking about absolute poverty, as Marmot has definitively demonstrated.
Even if better education is not a strong determinant of higher SES --
which I believe it is -- there is evidence that education level is
correlated with the SES gradient in health late in life.

 

And poverty is not the only social determinant of health.  As important
as it obviously is, I tend to think the goal of SDOH advocates is not
per se to reduce poverty, but to improve health and reduce human
suffering.

 

As I mentioned, we know that health literacy is an overwhelming
determinant of the pathways of chronic disease in particular.  Unless we
think that education is insignificant in health literacy, it's hard for
me to understand how education policy isn't a prime node for improving
health literacy, and thereby both improving health and ameliorating
health inequities.

 

Look, I agree that improving investment in education is alone going to
"cure" the U.S. health care problem.  But inasmuch as education is a
means, albeit indirect, of distributing resources in a more, if not
ideally equitable manner, I contend that it's a crucial nexus for SDOH
advocates in the U.S.  Income inequality leads to educational
inequality, which leads to health inequality.  It certainly would be
preferable to focus on the root cause of the problem -- income
inequality, but actual policy change requires understanding that what
ought to be done is not always what can be done, and that what can be
done is, while not dispositive, certainly important.

 

More radical income redistribution in the U.S. is certainly an idea I
support; but as a policy matter, it is VERY far away.  For god's sake;
we can't even agree in this country that having over 100 million
uninsured or underinsured is morally unconscionable.  How are we going
to find the political will to radically redistribute wealth?

 

Education is an indirect means of compressing the SES gradient, and of
improving health literacy, and these two factors alone justify the
belief (again, supported in the literature, as far as I'm aware) that
increasing investment in education will improve population health.  

 

 

________________________________

From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Dennis Raphael
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SDOH] Myths about health inequities...


I dont see it.  Educate everybody and tell me how that reduces poverty? 

dr 

Of related interest:

Poverty and Policy in Canada: Implications for Health and Quality of
Life by Dennis Raphael
Foreword by Jack Layton
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2df

Staying Alive: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness, and Health
Care, edited by Dennis Raphael, Toba Bryant, and Marcia Rioux
Foreword by Gary Teeple
http://tinyurl.com/2zqrox

Social Determinants of Health: Canadian Perspectives, edited by Dennis
Raphael
Foreword by Roy Romanow
http://tinyurl.com/yptzae

See a lecture!  The Politics of Population Health
http://msl.stream.yorku.ca/mediasite/viewer/?peid=ac604170-9ccc-4268-a1a
f-9a9e04b28e1d

Also, presentation on Politics and Health at the Centre for Health
Disparities in Cleveland Ohio
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4129139685624192201&hl=en

Dennis Raphael, PhD
Professor, School of Health Policy and Management
York University
4700 Keele Street
Toronto ON M3J 1P3
416-736-2100, ext. 22134
email: [log in to unmask]
http://www.atkinson.yorku.ca/draphael -------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask] 

To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header -- to [log in to unmask] 

SIGNOFF SDOH 

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU. 

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header. 

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname 

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.


For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] SET SDOH DIGEST 

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html 

------------------- Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner:
[log in to unmask] 

To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header -- to [log in to unmask] 

SIGNOFF SDOH 

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU. 

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header. 

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname 

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.


For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] SET SDOH DIGEST 

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html 

------------------- Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner:
[log in to unmask] 

To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header -- to [log in to unmask] 

SIGNOFF SDOH 

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU. 

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header. 

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname 

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.


For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] SET SDOH DIGEST 

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html 

------------------- Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner:
[log in to unmask] 

To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header -- to [log in to unmask] 

SIGNOFF SDOH 

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU. 

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header. 

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname 

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.


For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] SET SDOH DIGEST 

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html 


-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2