SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES: Re: Steroidal Neoclassicism
From:
[log in to unmask] (Peter J Boettke)
Date:
Tue Dec 26 10:47:39 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Alan,  
  
I suggest you look at the "debate" within Austrian economics between Robert Nozick (who
wrote an article on Austrian method) and Ludwig Lachmann (who choose to defend the
Austrian method).  Lachamm (like Donald Davidson) focused his response to Nozick's
critique of Austrian method on the appropriate level of analysis and discusses how it all
about "meaning".
  
You can read about this in the Austrian Economics Newsletter (Vol. 1, #1, 1977).  
  
Pete Boettke  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2