SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Peter G. Stillman)
Date:
Tue Jan 30 07:57:10 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Fred Foldvary asks: Were any economists prior to the 1930s for a pure free
market?

To me, that is a strange question in that Adam Smith, for instance, 
was not in favor of a pure free market -- he did not expect it in 
practice (I can find this cite) and did not advocate it in theory 
(see Bk. V of Wealth of Nations).  I suspect that Fred's "pure free 
marketers" are primarily a post-WW2 Anglo-American phenomenon (except 
for a few Lockeans in the late 18th-19th century).

Peter G. Stillman


ATOM RSS1 RSS2