------------ EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
Published by EH.NET (February 2007)
Herbert H. Kaplan, _Nathan Mayer Rothschild and the Creation of a
Dynasty: The Critical Years, 1806-1816_. Stanford: Stanford
University Press, 2006. xxiv + 194 pp. $45 (cloth), ISBN:
0-8047-5165-X.
Reviewed for EH.NET by Brandon Dupont, Department of Economics,
Western Washington University.
There is no better example of the potential for meteoric rise that
underlies financial capitalism than the story of the Rothschild
dynasty. Yet much of the true story of their rise remains shrouded
behind some enduring inaccuracies.
In just 177 pages of text, Herbert H. Kaplan manages to correct a
number of myths that have grown up around the rapid ascent of Nathan
Mayer Rothschild. Kaplan also draws on papers from the Royal Mint,
the British Treasury and the British commissary-in-chief to provide
details of just how important Rothschild's financing was to the
British defeat of Napoleon and to the post-war subsidies paid by the
British government to its wartime allies.
These corrections are, in themselves, important to understanding the
Rothschild dynasty. Moreover, as Niall Ferguson wrote in _The House
of Rothschild_, the economic history of capitalism is incomplete
until we at least make an attempt to correctly understand their
success. Mostly, this is because of the sheer magnitude of the
fortune they created -- a fortune which exceeded anything owned by an
individual today as a percentage of total world wealth.
In 1806, Nathan married Hannah Cohen, the daughter of a successful
Amsterdam diamond merchant. Kaplan shows that Hannah Cohen's marriage
settlement, contrary to Niall Ferguson's findings, was not added to
Nathan's capital. According to Kaplan, "the money was intended for
Hannah's use and there is no evidence that it was used by Nathan
Rothschild" (p. 10). This alone is important as Kaplan casts doubt on
the prevailing wisdom that the marriage provided Nathan with access
to his wife's capital. Of course, the marriage was not without
financial benefit to Nathan because the Cohen family connections did
allow Nathan access to extensive Jewish commercial networks
throughout Europe.
Both the extent to which Nathan was financially dependent on the
Cohens and the importance of reputation in the financial transactions
of this period are, I believe, important aspects of the story with
which Kaplan deals in the book. Given the significance of reputation
from the beginning of the Cohen-Rothschild connections, I was left
wanting more details on this important aspect of these transactions.
We are, however, told that Nathan's less than stellar reputation
forced him to rely on the bills of exchange of L.B. Cohen & Company,
which were readily accepted in international exchange when his own
bills of exchange were not because of his well-documented shoddy
business practices.
More details concerning the importance of reputation to these
transactions would probably have been better than some of the
minutiae that Kaplan does include. On page 24, for instance, Kaplan
tells us where Nathan collected his mail after moving from Manchester
to London. He also tells us the first time Nathan's principal clerk
sent mail to him at his new London address. While the reasons for
Rothschild's move to London are relevant (Kaplan speculates it was
due to Nathan's hope that he would take over the Cohen business after
Levy Cohen's death), the details of his address and mail collections
are not.
On more substantive topics, Kaplan takes issue with the view that
Nathan used the Elector of Hesse-Kessel's funds for his own
operations and that the ensuing profits were important in his
financial rise. The view that Nathan had somehow misused his position
with respect to the elector's investment began with Corti's
interpretation of the events in his _The Rise of the House of
Rothschild_ but was also carried forward in Ferguson's work. Kaplan
explains that this misconception is probably based on a ???189,500
certificate that took an inordinate amount of time to be delivered to
the elector even though a letter written to him from his financial
adviser on April 1811 indicated that, "Young Rothschild is actually
on his way to London to fetch the certificates of title regarding
your investment of capital" (p. 33). Despite this assurance, and
after considerably more time had passed, the elector had still not
received his documents, which prompted another round of letters.
Kaplan casts doubt on whether the "Young Rothschild" referred to in
the correspondence was actually Nathan and presents evidence that it
was more likely one of Nathan's brothers.
Kaplan describes in some detail how Nathan's mercantile career
skyrocketed in early 1809. In Chapter 3 he describes how Nathan
purchased ???80,000 worth of 3 percent consols through Harman &
Company, which purchased, sold and shipped specie and commodities for
Nathan and purchased and sold securities for both Nathan and his
father. These consol purchases were critical to the success of his
mercantile career and are thus an important part of Kaplan's
analysis. One of the fruits of Kaplan's meticulous study of the
archival records is his discovery of a document confirming this
consol purchase. There was also an additional purchase of consols
from Harman & Company, for which Nathan remitted cash and bills of
exchange to Harman & Company. Kaplan argues that the funds used in
these consol purchases were not ill-gotten but rather were from his
recent entry into the specie and bullion trade and from his father.
Nathan used his father's advances to pay for the specie and bullion
he shipped to Amsterdam and Frankfurt but, until his invoices became
due, "Nathan parked some of this money temporarily in safe 3 percent
Consols" (p. 38).
Kaplan also presents a fascinating discussion of how Nathan created a
niche in the international specie and bullion trade despite the
significant risks of his smuggling operations during Napoleon's
continental blockade. Nathan exploited arbitrage opportunities by
purchasing specie and bullion in England and selling it on the
Continent. Despite the considerable risks and complexities involved
in these operations, "Nathan Rothschild understood this market
mechanism quite well and exploited it to the fullest. He never simply
accepted the quotes from dealers, brokers, and bankers but bargained
and bullied his way through every transaction" (p. 52). While
Kaplan's detailed description of the arbitrage opportunities so
effectively mopped up by Nathan Rothschild is of considerable
interest, it is also the most difficult part of the book. More
general readers, who should be interested in the process by which a
shrewd financial player might exploit price differentials, will
probably be lost in some of the more technical passages in this
section of the book.
It was Nathan Rothschild's sizable overseas bullion and specie
operations (more precisely, his illegal smuggling operations) that
prompted commissary-in-chief John Charles Herries (whose job was to
acquire funds for the British armies in Spain and France) to turn to
him rather than to what may have been initially more likely sources
of financing like Baring Brothers or Hope & Company of Amsterdam.
Nathan's understanding of the fluctuating prices and exchange rates
and his business presence in St. Petersburg were all viewed as
helpful to the British government. The Russian market was a lucrative
one so the British may have viewed this as holding some potential for
future business dealings. It also turned out that Nathan's skills at
maintaining secrecy, likely developed in his smuggling experiences,
contributed to his ultimate success.
Whatever the reasons, the January 11, 1814 contract between
Rothschild and the British government not only helped in Wellington's
defeat of Napoleon but, along with his work on the postwar subsidies
to Britain's wartime allies, also cemented Nathan's position in
financial history. Kaplan presents evidence that Rothschild's role in
the British victory was even more important than previously
recognized. In Chapter Five we are told of contracts for several
secret commissary services that Nathan provided the British
government even before his contract to supply Wellington with specie
in the spring of 1814. These services, according to Kaplan, reveal
just how central Rothschild was to the efforts of the
commissary-in-chief.
_Nathan Mayer Rothschild and the Creation of a Dynasty_ is certainly
worthwhile reading for those interested not just in the Rothschild
dynasty but more generally in the operations of financial capitalism
early in the nineteenth century. It presents an interesting portrait
of the dynamics of entrepreneurship in the early nineteenth century
and is a welcome addition to the literature on entrepreneurial
activity and the economic history of capitalism in this period.
References:
Corti, E. (1928). _The Rise of the House of Rothschild_, New York:
Cosmopolitan Book Corporation.
Ferguson, N. (1998). _The House of Rothschild: Money's Prophets,
1798-1848_, New York: Viking.
Brandon Dupont is Assistant Professor of Economics at Western
Washington University. His most recent publication is "Bank Runs,
Information and Contagion in the Panic of 1893," which is forthcoming
in _Explorations in Economic History_. He is currently working on a
number of research projects including the development of private
banking in the nineteenth century.
Copyright (c) 2007 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be
copied for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to
the author and the list. For other permission, please contact the
EH.Net Administrator ([log in to unmask]; Telephone: 513-529-2229).
Published by EH.Net (February 2007). All EH.Net reviews are archived
at http://www.eh.net/BookReview.
-------------- FOOTER TO EH.NET BOOK REVIEW --------------
EH.Net-Review mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://eh.net/mailman/listinfo/eh.net-review
|