SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Humberto Barreto)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:14 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Background: 
For my undergraduate history of thought course, I use Heilbroner's Worldly Philosophers
and cover Smith, Ricardo, Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter, and Knight.
 
Idea: 
I want to conclude the section on Marx by comparing his views on the nature of human
beings to those of Smith. I believe it is reasonably fair to argue that Smith sees self-
interest as hard-wired and innate, while Marx believes it is learned (and depends upon
such capitalist institutions as private property).
 
Help: 
Can you suggest a reading that discusses this point? 
 
Google got me nothing, so I did a JSTOR search and again came up empty. I tried Smith and
Marx and innate in Economics and History journals. 121 hits later, I didn't see anything
jump out at me that I liked. So, instead of poking around in the electronic dark, I
thought I'd try the experts on this list.
 
You may send your suggestions or comments directly to me and I will report the results
after a few days.
 
Thanks in advance for your help, 
 
Humberto Barreto 
Wabash College 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2