SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Samuel Bostaph)
Date:
Tue Dec 25 12:01:00 2007
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
One needn't "romanticize" entrepreneurship to explain Schumpeter's "creative destruction" process. In MISES: THE LAST KNIGHT OF LIBERALISM [2007], Guido Huelsmann argues that Schumpeter's entrepreneur can be reconciled with Carl Menger's view of the market economy as a rational social order driven by consumer wants. It is only necessary to recognize, as did Mises, that entrepreneurs can only earn a profit if their innovations improve the satisfaction of consumer wants. Their constant--and sometimes revolutionary-- adjustments in the structure of production are geared toward their expectations of future consumer want satisfaction. Mises saw entrepreneurship as a social function. It is a role played by anyone who assumes the responsibility of meeting the uncertainty of the future; it is not particular people with unique qualities (a la Ayn Rand's fictional heroes).

All the specific historical circumstances that Mason mentions bear upon and affect the particulars of the revenue--cost projections that people performing the entrepreneurial function use in their calculations of potentially profitable innovations.

Sam Bostaph

ATOM RSS1 RSS2