Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri Sep 29 13:04:15 2006 |
In-Reply-To: |
<200609290950169.SM00260@[192.91.253.73]> |
Message-ID: |
|
References: |
<200609290950169.SM00260@[192.91.253.73]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Samuel Bostaph wrote:
>John Medaille wrote:
> >I was answering your question of how D of L was connected with
> >hierarchy. The "pin-factory" is the commonly accepted meaning,
> >and it leads to a multiplication of a pointless, expensive, and
> >inefficient management structure.
>
>
>It is difficult to take issue with an observation that some people are
>just bad cooks.
I am having difficulty connecting your comment
with mine. The issue is not whether the cooks are
good or bad, but how much "management overhead"
they require. It is clear that the more
specialization, the more the management function
grows in cost, power, and importance. Even good
pin-makers (or good cooks), if they are confined
to one of the 18 operations, will need a strong
management structure; if each can perform the
whole process, they will need less or nil.
Specialization along the "pin-factory" model
deskills and disempowers workers, with the result
that putative skill and actual power passes to a new group.
John C. Medaille
|
|
|